Both Ondaatje and Pagnucci have different ways of using genres, tones, and senses to shape their stories, also making it fairly difficult to figure out
Pagnucci shows a great deal of understanding his writings by using organization and by a lot of detail. I personally like reading a lot of details. It gives me a better understanding and also makes me feel like I am involved within the story I can picture what is going on in my mind without actually being there.
Ondaatje on the other hand uses headlines. I think these help with setting the tone and also giving a short few words of possibly what to expect to you will be reading next and it also helps with breaking down content so the reader is not bouncing back and forth with ideas. Ondaatje also uses a lot of poetry throughout this writing showing how different styles can be incorporated.
Pagnucci shows a great deal of understanding his writings by using organization and by a lot of detail. I personally like reading a lot of details. It gives me a better understanding and also makes me feel like I am involved within the story I can picture what is going on in my mind without actually being there.
Ondaatje on the other hand uses headlines. I think these help with setting the tone and also giving a short few words of possibly what to expect to you will be reading next and it also helps with breaking down content so the reader is not bouncing back and forth with ideas. Ondaatje also uses a lot of poetry throughout this writing showing how different styles can be incorporated.
RSS Feed